tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-733074358901582680.post1880800554468233745..comments2024-03-13T07:28:50.206-04:00Comments on Healthcare Standards: CCDA Release 2.0 Out for Ballot Keith W. Boonehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16883038460949909300noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-733074358901582680.post-33979832023738161752016-06-27T10:19:38.191-04:002016-06-27T10:19:38.191-04:00I don't understand your question.I don't understand your question.Keith W. Boonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16883038460949909300noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-733074358901582680.post-89588885813796142892016-06-27T09:48:08.626-04:002016-06-27T09:48:08.626-04:00Hi Keith ,
Please let me which is OID in CCDA Sap...Hi Keith ,<br /><br />Please let me which is OID in CCDA SapleAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03018653163950377070noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-733074358901582680.post-78092238021007922862013-09-05T10:51:11.096-04:002013-09-05T10:51:11.096-04:00That's good to know. That means my estimate f...That's good to know. That means my estimate for a detailed review goes down from four weeks to three. <br /><br />With regard to your final point, if we cannot learn from our past failures, we are doomed to repeat them. I urge that we learn from them, and thus improve the quality our processes.<br /><br />I'm suggesting a very simple change, either pre-adopt the proposed changes for template versioning that you (I'm assuming I know you given tone and style of writing) and others having been working on, or wait for it to be delivered.Keith W. Boonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16883038460949909300noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-733074358901582680.post-7753361770919654592013-09-05T10:43:50.857-04:002013-09-05T10:43:50.857-04:00260 pages are for the detailed changed log so adam...260 pages are for the detailed changed log so adamantly requested by some people, leaving 102 additional pages covering the 40 NEW templates and changed/additional conformance statements in existing templates. Since there are 2 volumes some of the additional pages account for duplicate things, such as, Cover pages and Table of Contents.<br /><br />In life, things naturally improve over time, but not if there is nothing to improve upon. Some people complain, and some people deliver.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-733074358901582680.post-20609679919864316652013-09-05T10:23:17.219-04:002013-09-05T10:23:17.219-04:00Yup, and they happen to be an Accreditor of HL7 In...Yup, and they happen to be an Accreditor of HL7 International and a number of other SDOs which develop International standards. History.Keith W. Boonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16883038460949909300noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-733074358901582680.post-40497976266520804792013-09-05T10:17:44.010-04:002013-09-05T10:17:44.010-04:00Hmmm "AMERICAN National Standards Institute&q...Hmmm "AMERICAN National Standards Institute" .....: The American National Standards Institute is a private non-profit organization that oversees the development of voluntary consensus standards for products, services, processes, systems, and personnel in the United States.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-733074358901582680.post-86971189043934893872013-09-05T09:26:52.917-04:002013-09-05T09:26:52.917-04:00To my knowledge, the workgroup HAS NOT requested t...To my knowledge, the workgroup HAS NOT requested this restriction. Furthermore, ANSI rules indicate that ANY affected party may vote, location isn't a restriction. So, I'm not sure that restriction works. If you have a non-US address, you should still be able to vote. I know many people with non-US addresses that develop software for the US. Should they not be able to vote? The precedent being set in CCDA R2 is something that impacts all HL7 members.Keith W. Boonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16883038460949909300noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-733074358901582680.post-44409588867938528202013-09-05T08:02:01.961-04:002013-09-05T08:02:01.961-04:00until now HL7 CHINA have published five document l...until now HL7 CHINA have published five document level IG,we have many section and entry level templates reused in these five IG,but the template workgroup is still using the word to organize these templates,we have discussed about the version managent about template,later on we may use a tool just like Art-Decor or MDHT for this purpose.edwin_uestchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10151953563083276828noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-733074358901582680.post-31367753525851495222013-09-04T14:32:21.313-04:002013-09-04T14:32:21.313-04:00Not true. Quote from the GOM:
"13.01.02.01 ...Not true. Quote from the GOM:<br /><br />"13.01.02.01 US Realm-specific Review Group <br />A Work Group may declare an informative document as US Realm-specific in that its function is to constrain an HL7 Protocol Specification (§02.02) for implementation in the United States of America (USA). The Work Group may request that the consensus group be restricted to those applicable to US Realm-specific documents; i.e. current individual members or representatives of current <br />organizational members whose primary address or place of business is in the USA. The consensus group for US Realm-specific documents shall be managed by HL7 staff via the Ballot Desktop prior to <br />release of the ballot material. <br /><br />A materially affected party who does not meet the criteria for participation may petition the TSC to join the consensus group. The request to participate in a US Realm-specific consensus group shall be sent to the Associate Executive Director and shall include the rationale justifying participation. The TSC decision on such requests shall be final."<br /><br />So if you are an affiliate member or an HL7 International member with a non-US address you can't vote without convincing the TSC you have some special reason. (And not liking a particular spec probably isn't going to be sufficient.)Lloyd McKenziehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00932569469355993605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-733074358901582680.post-10787319835339066052013-09-04T06:27:33.908-04:002013-09-04T06:27:33.908-04:00All HL7 members can vote on this document. That&#...All HL7 members can vote on this document. That's on of the "benefits" of not having a US Affiliate.Keith W. Boonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16883038460949909300noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-733074358901582680.post-60255776085632235312013-09-04T03:13:50.141-04:002013-09-04T03:13:50.141-04:00I fully agree, and I'd vote No if I had a vote...I fully agree, and I'd vote No if I had a vote - which I don't, for this is a US-realm only ballot.<br /><br />About 2 years ago RIMBAA (the v3 software implementers group within HL7) identified both 'template management' tools as well as 'code generation' tools as key enablers of CDA implementation. Software exists for both tool categories, you rightly identify the lack of a common template definition expression language as an issue - the current tools are in now way compatible with each other.<br /><br />Any CDA implementation guide should be shipped with some electronic expression of all of the templates contained therein, and HL7 should ensure that code generators exist for at least the Java and the .net platforms.<br /><br />IMHO schematron simply don't cut it, we should NOT spend any more time on the creation or generation of schematron to validate templates.Rene Spronkhttp://www.ringholm.com/column/rs_last_en.htmnoreply@blogger.com