So, looking at this XML:
‹items› ‹item›Outer Item 1‹/item› ‹item›Inner Item 1.1‹/item› ‹item›Inner Item 1.2‹/item› ‹item›Inner Item 1.3‹/item› ‹item›Outer Item 2‹/item› ‹item›Inner Item 2.1‹/item› ‹item›Inner Item 2.2‹/item› ‹item›Outer Item 3‹/item› ‹item›Outer Item 4‹/item› ‹item›Inner Item 4.1‹/item› ‹item›Outer Item 5‹/item› ‹/items›
Assume you want to produce this:
‹items› ‹outer›‹title›Outer Item 1‹/title› ‹item›Inner Item 1.1‹/item› ‹item›Inner Item 1.2‹/item› ‹item›Inner Item 1.3‹/item› ‹/outer› ‹outer›‹title›Outer Item 2‹/title› ‹item›Inner Item 2.1‹/item› ‹item›Inner Item 2.2‹/item› ‹/outer› ‹outer›‹title›Outer Item 3‹/title›‹/outer› ‹outer›‹title›Outer Item 4‹/title› ‹item›Inner Item 4.1‹/item› ‹/outer› ‹outer›‹title›Outer Item 5‹/title› ‹/outer› ‹/items›
- So the outer items wrapper is the same. Inside it you have more work to do.
- The first step is to process all item children of items that contain the text "Outer Item" (or whatever other matching criteria signals the start of a new list.
- The next step is to find the end of the list of inner components. That's simply the next "Outer Item" that follows this one in sequence.
- Now, the trick. You process each following sibling of the Outer Item that precedes the end point.
‹xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="1.0"› ‹xsl:template match="items"› ‹xsl:copy›‹!-- 1 --› ‹xsl:apply-templates select="item[contains(.,'Outer')]"/›‹!-- 2 --› ‹/xsl:copy› ‹/xsl:template› ‹xsl:template match="item"› ‹outer›‹title›‹xsl:value-of select="."/›‹/title› ‹xsl:variable name="endPoint" select="following-sibling::item[contains(.,'Outer')][1]" /›‹!-- 3 --› ‹xsl:for-each select="following-sibling::item[ . = $endPoint/preceding-sibling::item ]"›‹!-- 4 --› ‹inner›‹xsl:value-of select="."/›‹/inner› ‹/xsl:for-each› ‹/outer› ‹/xsl:template› ‹/xsl:stylesheet›
Now, if you think about what this is doing, it doesn't seem to be the MOST efficient way to process because you are creating two lists using the preceding-sibling and following-sibling axes in XPath, and then intersecting them. But:
1) these lists are likely to be delayed in their complete evaluation until needed, and
2) A smart XSLT processor can and SHOULD recognize this idiom and use a more efficient evaluation
It's a handy thing to know how to do when you have to process lists of stuff that doen't use list-type XML markup to indicate list boundaries, and you don't have access to Java or EXSLT extensions to support procedural programming.
Now, can you guess what I was doing? It's related to a previous post on some other blog...
0 comments:
Post a Comment